Tonality Pro Activation Code

I noticed that a bunch of Macphun's software is on sale at the moment. Are they worth buying? You guys got any suggestions on which ones are worth the money? Am I getting anything out of these software that I may not get out of Adobe Lightroom?

Tonality Pro For Windows

Does Macphun's software work with RAW files and can it act as a plug-in for Lightroom? I have read good stuff about Macphun Tonality and that may be worth getting. Aurora HDR seems to have a lot of coverage lately as it's endorsed by Trey Ratcliff. Is that HDR software as good as what the hype say it is? SgtStrider wrote:I noticed that a bunch of Macphun's software is on sale at the moment. Are they worth buying? You guys got any suggestions on which ones are worth the money?

Activation Code Kaspersky

Am I getting anything out of these software that I may not get out of Adobe Lightroom? Does Macphun's software work with RAW files and can it act as a plug-in for Lightroom? I have read good stuff about Macphun Tonality and that may be worth getting. Aurora HDR seems to have a lot of coverage lately as it's endorsed by Trey Ratcliff. Is that HDR software as good as what the hype say it is?I bought their Creative Kit (CK) back when it was on sale. I'm glad I have it now, but I think it's only worth what you get when it's on sale.I've used Intensify, Snapheal, and Noiseless, and they work really well, without a lot of manual diving to figure things out. Best bet would be to search on youtube for some tutorials and watch what these apps can do.They are plug-in ready for Lightroom.

I originally purchased them for use in Apple Photos app, but since then, I've moved on the Lightroom CC.I have Photomatix, Trey Ratcliff's former go-to HDR software, so I'll probably stick with that for the time being.Hope this helps.Tom. 'Sick cultures show a complex of symptoms such as you have named.but a dying culture invariable exhibits personal rudeness. Lack of consideration for others in minor matters.

A loss of politeness, of gentle manners is more significant than a riot.' This symptom is especially serious in that an individual displaying it never thinks of it as a sign of ill health but as proof of his/her strength.Friday, it is too late to save this culture-this worldwide culture. Therefore we must now prepare the monasteries for the coming Dark Age. Electronic records are too fragile.'

Heinlein in 'Friday'. SgtStrider wrote:I noticed that a bunch of Macphun's software is on sale at the moment.

Are they worth buying? You guys got any suggestions on which ones are worth the money? Am I getting anything out of these software that I may not get out of Adobe Lightroom? Does Macphun's software work with RAW files and can it act as a plug-in for Lightroom? I have read good stuff about Macphun Tonality and that may be worth getting.

Aurora HDR seems to have a lot of coverage lately as it's endorsed by Trey Ratcliff. Is that HDR software as good as what the hype say it is?Maybe you already know you can buy MacPhun either from MacPhun (Creative Kit 2016) or from the Apple store. Kitsap2 wrote:SgtStrider wrote:I noticed that a bunch of Macphun's software is on sale at the moment. Are they worth buying? You guys got any suggestions on which ones are worth the money? Am I getting anything out of these software that I may not get out of Adobe Lightroom?

Does Macphun's software work with RAW files and can it act as a plug-in for Lightroom? I have read good stuff about Macphun Tonality and that may be worth getting. Aurora HDR seems to have a lot of coverage lately as it's endorsed by Trey Ratcliff.

Is that HDR software as good as what the hype say it is?I bought their Creative Kit (CK) back when it was on sale. I'm glad I have it now, but I think it's only worth what you get when it's on sale.I've used Intensify, Snapheal, and Noiseless, and they work really well, without a lot of manual diving to figure things out. Best bet would be to search on youtube for some tutorials and watch what these apps can do.They are plug-in ready for Lightroom. I originally purchased them for use in Apple Photos app, but since then, I've moved on the Lightroom CC.I have Photomatix, Trey Ratcliff's former go-to HDR software, so I'll probably stick with that for the time being.Hope this helps.TomDo you really like Intensify? I enjoy Aurora HDR and wanted to replicate its 'image radiance' and 'glow' effects in Intensify. But I don't believe Intensify has such a provision.

It also seems a bit lacking compared to Nik Color Efex. Buybuybuy wrote:kitsap2 wrote:SgtStrider wrote:I noticed that a bunch of Macphun's software is on sale at the moment. Are they worth buying? You guys got any suggestions on which ones are worth the money? Am I getting anything out of these software that I may not get out of Adobe Lightroom? Does Macphun's software work with RAW files and can it act as a plug-in for Lightroom?

I have read good stuff about Macphun Tonality and that may be worth getting. Aurora HDR seems to have a lot of coverage lately as it's endorsed by Trey Ratcliff.

Is that HDR software as good as what the hype say it is?I bought their Creative Kit (CK) back when it was on sale. I'm glad I have it now, but I think it's only worth what you get when it's on sale.I've used Intensify, Snapheal, and Noiseless, and they work really well, without a lot of manual diving to figure things out. Best bet would be to search on youtube for some tutorials and watch what these apps can do.They are plug-in ready for Lightroom. I originally purchased them for use in Apple Photos app, but since then, I've moved on the Lightroom CC.I have Photomatix, Trey Ratcliff's former go-to HDR software, so I'll probably stick with that for the time being.Hope this helps.TomDo you really like Intensify? I enjoy Aurora HDR and wanted to replicate its 'image radiance' and 'glow' effects in Intensify. But I don't believe Intensify has such a provision. It also seems a bit lacking compared to Nik Color Efex.I do like what I've been able to edit with Intensify, I'm still experimenting with it.

I don't have any NIK products, so I can't make a comparison.Tom. Kitsap2 wrote:buybuybuy wrote:kitsap2 wrote:SgtStrider wrote:I noticed that a bunch of Macphun's software is on sale at the moment. Are they worth buying?

You guys got any suggestions on which ones are worth the money? Am I getting anything out of these software that I may not get out of Adobe Lightroom? Does Macphun's software work with RAW files and can it act as a plug-in for Lightroom? I have read good stuff about Macphun Tonality and that may be worth getting. Aurora HDR seems to have a lot of coverage lately as it's endorsed by Trey Ratcliff.

Is that HDR software as good as what the hype say it is?I bought their Creative Kit (CK) back when it was on sale. I'm glad I have it now, but I think it's only worth what you get when it's on sale.I've used Intensify, Snapheal, and Noiseless, and they work really well, without a lot of manual diving to figure things out. Best bet would be to search on youtube for some tutorials and watch what these apps can do.They are plug-in ready for Lightroom. I originally purchased them for use in Apple Photos app, but since then, I've moved on the Lightroom CC.I have Photomatix, Trey Ratcliff's former go-to HDR software, so I'll probably stick with that for the time being.Hope this helps.TomDo you really like Intensify? I enjoy Aurora HDR and wanted to replicate its 'image radiance' and 'glow' effects in Intensify. But I don't believe Intensify has such a provision.

It also seems a bit lacking compared to Nik Color Efex.I do like what I've been able to edit with Intensify, I'm still experimenting with it. I don't have any NIK products, so I can't make a comparison.TomInteresting, thanks! Kitsap2 wrote:I have Photomatix, Trey Ratcliff's former go-to HDR software, so I'll probably stick with that for the time being.Heh.Macphun is touting his Aurora HDR now. It has some of the features in other Macphun applications, so it might be worth looking at. One sorta downside of the CK collection is that each is a separate application, so if you work with RAW you'll have to export as TIFF to work in another in some cases, although you can (if you start from a standalone, not a plugin) save in Macphun's format.

But Aurora is a kind of swiss army knife of adjusting.One of the things I dislike is that their support doesn't keep up with their application changes. For example, good luck trying to find out if there are major difference between the CK versions and MAS versions. Before the CK, the non-MAS versions not only functioned as plugins, but there were also differences in how many layers you could use. Dunno if that's changed; can't find out. I do think the MAS versions can still function as standalones, not just as Photos extensions, but better check.I think they're pretty great, although my fav is Tonality CK. I also have Nik's Siver efex.

Some things are better in Tonality (layers, RAW); some in SEF (tools for spot changes). And of course if you ever use Photos Macphun's are pretty good there as well, although subject to the many limitations of Photos.The workflow in RAW with Macphun's stuff is second only to DxO. You can transfer RAW from Lr to Macphun; can't do that with Nik and many others.If you were just interested in the Photos extensions, take a look at DxO as well; Optics Pro and Viewpoint are in the MAS now and on sale, although not quite like the standalones (which may also be on sale as well, and in some ways maybe superior to Macphun, depending on what you need to do. Rather different in many ways).I didn't see a 'glow' preset in Intensify CK (but not sure if it's the same, just a different name). I'd say Intensify has more dramatic presets than Color Efex 4, but the big differences are that Intensify will take a RAW or TIFF sent from Lr; Efex only does a TIFF.

And once there, having a RAW has some advantages obviously. Intensify has layers and layer masking, which are great; but Colo Efex has those unique control points that are rather more than just brush-like tools. So sorta still apples and oranges a bit.“Art is not what you see, but what you make others see.”— Edgar Degas. Kitsap2 wrote:SgtStrider wrote:I noticed that a bunch of Macphun's software is on sale at the moment. Are they worth buying? You guys got any suggestions on which ones are worth the money?

Am I getting anything out of these software that I may not get out of Adobe Lightroom? Does Macphun's software work with RAW files and can it act as a plug-in for Lightroom?

I have read good stuff about Macphun Tonality and that may be worth getting. Aurora HDR seems to have a lot of coverage lately as it's endorsed by Trey Ratcliff. Is that HDR software as good as what the hype say it is?I bought their Creative Kit (CK) back when it was on sale. I'm glad I have it now, but I think it's only worth what you get when it's on sale.I've used Intensify, Snapheal, and Noiseless, and they work really well, without a lot of manual diving to figure things out. Best bet would be to search on youtube for some tutorials and watch what these apps can do.They are plug-in ready for Lightroom. I originally purchased them for use in Apple Photos app, but since then, I've moved on the Lightroom CC.I have Photomatix, Trey Ratcliff's former go-to HDR software, so I'll probably stick with that for the time being.Hope this helps.TomHow much did you paid for the CK?

Is it still on sale right now? Mike Boreham wrote:SgtStrider wrote:I noticed that a bunch of Macphun's software is on sale at the moment. Are they worth buying? You guys got any suggestions on which ones are worth the money?

Am I getting anything out of these software that I may not get out of Adobe Lightroom? Does Macphun's software work with RAW files and can it act as a plug-in for Lightroom? I have read good stuff about Macphun Tonality and that may be worth getting. Aurora HDR seems to have a lot of coverage lately as it's endorsed by Trey Ratcliff. Is that HDR software as good as what the hype say it is?Maybe you already know you can buy MacPhun either from MacPhun (Creative Kit 2016) or from the Apple store. Robgendreau wrote:kitsap2 wrote:I have Photomatix, Trey Ratcliff's former go-to HDR software, so I'll probably stick with that for the time being.Heh.Macphun is touting his Aurora HDR now.

It has some of the features in other Macphun applications, so it might be worth looking at. One sorta downside of the CK collection is that each is a separate application, so if you work with RAW you'll have to export as TIFF to work in another in some cases, although you can (if you start from a standalone, not a plugin) save in Macphun's format. But Aurora is a kind of swiss army knife of adjusting.One of the things I dislike is that their support doesn't keep up with their application changes. For example, good luck trying to find out if there are major difference between the CK versions and MAS versions. Before the CK, the non-MAS versions not only functioned as plugins, but there were also differences in how many layers you could use. Dunno if that's changed; can't find out.

I do think the MAS versions can still function as standalones, not just as Photos extensions, but better check.I think they're pretty great, although my fav is Tonality CK. I also have Nik's Siver efex. Some things are better in Tonality (layers, RAW); some in SEF (tools for spot changes). And of course if you ever use Photos Macphun's are pretty good there as well, although subject to the many limitations of Photos.The workflow in RAW with Macphun's stuff is second only to DxO.

You can transfer RAW from Lr to Macphun; can't do that with Nik and many others.If you were just interested in the Photos extensions, take a look at DxO as well; Optics Pro and Viewpoint are in the MAS now and on sale, although not quite like the standalones (which may also be on sale as well, and in some ways maybe superior to Macphun, depending on what you need to do. Rather different in many ways).I didn't see a 'glow' preset in Intensify CK (but not sure if it's the same, just a different name). I'd say Intensify has more dramatic presets than Color Efex 4, but the big differences are that Intensify will take a RAW or TIFF sent from Lr; Efex only does a TIFF. And once there, having a RAW has some advantages obviously. Intensify has layers and layer masking, which are great; but Colo Efex has those unique control points that are rather more than just brush-like tools.

So sorta still apples and oranges a bit.“Art is not what you see, but what you make others see.”— Edgar DegasDoes the MAS versions with with a Lightroom base workflow? I don't like exporting TIFFS. SgtStrider wrote:kitsap2 wrote:SgtStrider wrote:I noticed that a bunch of Macphun's software is on sale at the moment. Are they worth buying? You guys got any suggestions on which ones are worth the money?

Am I getting anything out of these software that I may not get out of Adobe Lightroom? Does Macphun's software work with RAW files and can it act as a plug-in for Lightroom? I have read good stuff about Macphun Tonality and that may be worth getting.

Aurora HDR seems to have a lot of coverage lately as it's endorsed by Trey Ratcliff. Is that HDR software as good as what the hype say it is?I bought their Creative Kit (CK) back when it was on sale. I'm glad I have it now, but I think it's only worth what you get when it's on sale.I've used Intensify, Snapheal, and Noiseless, and they work really well, without a lot of manual diving to figure things out. Best bet would be to search on youtube for some tutorials and watch what these apps can do.They are plug-in ready for Lightroom. I originally purchased them for use in Apple Photos app, but since then, I've moved on the Lightroom CC.I have Photomatix, Trey Ratcliff's former go-to HDR software, so I'll probably stick with that for the time being.Hope this helps.TomHow much did you paid for the CK? Is it still on sale right now?See. They are offering the CK + extras at the moment for $109.99.

Don't know how long it lasts. Contains all their software excluding Aurora HDR. SgtStrider wrote:Mike Boreham wrote:SgtStrider wrote:I noticed that a bunch of Macphun's software is on sale at the moment. Are they worth buying? You guys got any suggestions on which ones are worth the money?

Am I getting anything out of these software that I may not get out of Adobe Lightroom? Does Macphun's software work with RAW files and can it act as a plug-in for Lightroom? I have read good stuff about Macphun Tonality and that may be worth getting. Aurora HDR seems to have a lot of coverage lately as it's endorsed by Trey Ratcliff. Is that HDR software as good as what the hype say it is?Maybe you already know you can buy MacPhun either from MacPhun (Creative Kit 2016) or from the Apple store.

SgtStrider wrote:I noticed that a bunch of Macphun's software is on sale at the moment. Are they worth buying? You guys got any suggestions on which ones are worth the money? Am I getting anything out of these software that I may not get out of Adobe Lightroom? Does Macphun's software work with RAW files and can it act as a plug-in for Lightroom?

I have read good stuff about Macphun Tonality and that may be worth getting. Aurora HDR seems to have a lot of coverage lately as it's endorsed by Trey Ratcliff. Is that HDR software as good as what the hype say it is?I like their software, a lot. I mostly use it when I want to create a certain effect or if something it just too much hassle to do the hard way in PS. Their apps are very easy to use and let you have great results very quick, with all the flexibility of layers and other advanced editing features.I do not use Aurora, as I seldom do HDR and when I do I prefer to do it in PS or LR as it gives me the most natural results. I like my HDR to look like it is not an HDR.Also, their support is great.

I have had questions a couple of times, and I always got a response within the hour. Even today, as I was checking their site due to this thread (1.5h ago), I fired off a question regarding CK and upgrading, I got a reply in under an hour telling me they gave me a free activation code for CK and a link to the installer because I had 5 of their pro apps already and I was a loyal customer.

Nice xmas present. Now, I know I could upgrade my apps to the CK versions free, except for the MAS version of FX Photo Studio, but they didn't have to do that. Now I have all apps on the latest version plus a single installer and activation code instead of 5 different ones, which makes reinstalling a lot easier and quicker.

But that's just the company they are: getting out of their way to help and assist their customers. If only all companies treated their customers like they do. Afterburn wrote:SgtStrider wrote:kitsap2 wrote:SgtStrider wrote:I noticed that a bunch of Macphun's software is on sale at the moment. Are they worth buying?

You guys got any suggestions on which ones are worth the money? Am I getting anything out of these software that I may not get out of Adobe Lightroom? Does Macphun's software work with RAW files and can it act as a plug-in for Lightroom? I have read good stuff about Macphun Tonality and that may be worth getting. Aurora HDR seems to have a lot of coverage lately as it's endorsed by Trey Ratcliff. Is that HDR software as good as what the hype say it is?I bought their Creative Kit (CK) back when it was on sale.

I'm glad I have it now, but I think it's only worth what you get when it's on sale.I've used Intensify, Snapheal, and Noiseless, and they work really well, without a lot of manual diving to figure things out. Best bet would be to search on youtube for some tutorials and watch what these apps can do.They are plug-in ready for Lightroom. I originally purchased them for use in Apple Photos app, but since then, I've moved on the Lightroom CC.I have Photomatix, Trey Ratcliff's former go-to HDR software, so I'll probably stick with that for the time being.Hope this helps.TomHow much did you paid for the CK? Is it still on sale right now?See.

They are offering the CK + extras at the moment for $109.99. Don't know how long it lasts.

Contains all their software excluding Aurora HDR.Is that what you paid? Is that the lowest price Macphun ever offered for their CK?